USA Triathlon Launches Revamped Elevate 2028 Strategic Plan

USA Triathlon has unveiled a revised strategic plan through the 2028 Olympic Games in Los Angeles, calling the revamped plan “Elevate 2028: Focus Forward.”
Calling 2025 the “midpoint of our journey,” the revised plan features heavy focuses across the entirety of USA Triathlon stakeholders — athletes, coaches, clubs, and race directors.
Victoria Brumfield, USA Triathlon Chief Executive Officer, said in a statement, “Elevate 2028: Focus Forward is more than a strategic plan — it’s our commitment to serving the athletes, race directors, coaches, clubs, and entire multisport community that make our sport thrive.”
According to USA Triathlon’s documentation on the plan, success of the plan will be measured by the following five factors after the 2028 Games:
- The multisport industry is “thriving with more businesses succeeding in the sport.”
- Accessibility to triathlon is increased, with the sport “ready to support more athletes participating at all levels.”
- The elite development pipeline is “robust,” with the Olympic and Paralympic Team “prepared to achieve historic success at LA2028 and beyond.”
- The multisport community is “continuously inspired by athlete stories.”
- USA Triathlon is viewed as “the most valued partner in multisport.”
How USA Triathlon looks to achieve those outcomes is multi pronged.
Growing the Multisport Industry
USAT is emphasizing the need for businesses to be successful — especially those that produce races and help athletes reach those events. Two of their keys to that growth stem from data use. Firstly, the plan calls to “leverage data to generate and deliver insights that enable more effective decision-making.” The second is perhaps more actionable, which is utilizing data for the purposes of developing customized marketing plans which can create cross-functional opportunities between race directors, coaches, and clubs.
There is also an enhanced focus on training opportunities. USA Triathlon currently offers certifications for coaches, race directors, and officials. The stated goal of these certifications is to “ensure USA Triathlon-affiliated multisport constituents are recognized as highly credible and competent, and that their certification is widely sought after.” As a former certified coach, I can at least attest to the quality of the Level I certification course itself. However, the continuing education courses have long felt like an afterthought. To that end, Elevate 2028 makes a commitment to “improve certification value to more clearly deliver against the core needs of Race Directors and Coaches.”
Expanding Multisport Participation
Ultimately, having more triathletes has to be the end goal of USAT. Given that the bulk of income generated by the organization comes from annual memberships, getting more people into the sport is mission critical. It’s baked into the tagline for this section of the plan: “We help athletes start racing, race more, and race better.”
When athletes are polled, there are traditionally three large barriers to entry to triathlon: cost, time, and lack of existing connection to events. Under Elevate 2028, USAT has committed to addressing all three of these issues. On cost, USAT states that they will launch initiatives to increase the affordability of races and the sport as a whole. There is also an emphasis on increasing programming that encourages athletes to race more frequently. With regard to the other two primary barriers to entry, USAT commits to expand the definition of multisport to even more formats, and to help address racing deserts. For example, I currently live in one — there is a single USAT-certified triathlon held within a 60 minute drive from my house annually, despite there being a relatively healthy running and cycling event scene.
There is also commitment to developing deeper relationships between individuals and clubs, as well as better create pathways for athletes to become coaches, club founders, or race directors. This makes a lot of sense, given that many of these existing constituents look at potential succession planning.
Elite Development and Performance Remains a Core Tenant
USAT has sometimes conflicting needs between its age group and Elite stakeholders. With a home Olympic Games on the radar, Elite development pathways and performance at the 2028 Olympic Games remains a key component of the strategic plan.
That said, Elevate 2028 puts a stronger emphasis on starting the Elite development pipeline at earlier ages, which should also wind up benefitting growth in the age group ranks down the road. Specifically, the plan calls for expansion in youth programming through a combination of development and fundraising support. Similarly, USAT looks to expand high school and collegiate club triathlon, while also continuing to pursue NCAA championship status for women’s triathlon.
With regard to performance at the pinnacle of the sport, USAT commits to “deliver world-class resources, services, training opportunities, and event access that empower our elite athletes to continuously push their limits.” This should not come as much of a surprise, given how much of the annual budget that USAT has traditionally spent on Elite sport.
“Looking at program services, there are two areas that drive the bulk of spending. The most spending occurs in the “high performance” bucket, representing a total of $4.2 million. According to the Form 990, spending in this area represents support for “Olympic and Paralympic athletes, as well as approximately 450 elite athletes across the country, from youth and junior to Olympic and Paralympic hopefuls, to continue to pursue their athletic goals.” The financial statement breaks this down further, including: $1.8 million for travel; $877,000 for salaries; $499,000 for professional fees; and $492,000 in a bucket of “other event/athlete.”
A Brand Split on the Horizon?
The Elevate 2028 plan notes that USA Triathlon is a key storyteller within our sport. I would tend to agree with that; when there’s strong storytelling from USAT, the sport feels healthier. But, for example, when there was a lack of capitalization on Gwen Jorgensen’s gold medal in Rio (followed by her subsequent move into running), it felt like USAT didn’t have the resources or bench strength to broadcast that story.
The plan is full of some typical marketing-speak regarding “strengthening the brand” and “grow exposure to build awareness.” But nestled within the document is perhaps a key nugget of information: Elite athletes are going to be under their own sub-brand in the future. What that particular sub-brand may be is yet to be seen. However, Elevate 2028 commits to dedicating significant marketing resources to build that sub-brand and to “position our elite athletes as the aspirational focus of the sport.”
It’s a bold strategy. Along with the alignment on storytelling around a home Games, it has a lot of strong potential. The devil, as always, will be in the details.
Transforming the Way USA Triathlon Works
For those that have followed our coverage regarding USA Triathlon’s finances, it should not come as a surprise that the revised strategic plan speaks heavily on seeking to achieve operational excellence. That really comes down to two key areas: having key talent in key positions, and improving overall financial performance of the organization.
On the former, USAT has been making many moves across the organization to hire key talent and giving them opportunities to grow. Brumfield, of course, was an internal hire into the CEO role, having served as Chief of Staff under Rocky Harris. There have also been key hires in high performance and in partnership development. It would appear that investment is starting to pay off, given the number of partnerships announced over the last six weeks.
With regard to financial performance, the plan is less clear. There’s language on creating “operational efficiencies,” which is frequently code for either digitizing existing functions, or the classic “doing more with less.” (To be clear, there is nothing here suggesting that USAT is following the latter of those statements.) But the other key tenant is on “building long-term organizational stability” with finances. That, ultimately, has to be the guiding principle of the organization.
Any numbers attached to this?
Or just mostly hopeful growth language without direction and commitment?
Strategic plans generally don’t put concrete targets in.
But something we will ask Victoria (we have an upcoming interview planned)
It’s interesting, going into a home games and I sorta see more questions than answers with the direction/chances of our elites; probaly the biggest question mark going into an olympics in a decade or so. There are some wily veterans that are likely to still be around (Knibb / Pearson) but there is also some talent that may just be a little too raw at world class level to have the best impact. Where will the women be will be my big question mark, as I think the raw talent on the men’s side will be sorta low key scaled to attack the MTR as the best medal chance over any individual talent.
Back in my days working in the corporate world, I saw quite a few of these types of strategic plans. Of course, they all sound great – they are written by marketing types, who know how to pile on the hype.
But, then, most of them run up against “the real world”. Resource constraints, issues that are caused by factors beyond their control, etc. Momentum fades…
Let’s take just one example – cost as an impediment to triathlon participation. How are they going to meaningfully impact that (other than by reducing USAT membership fees - which ain’t likely to happen)? Are they going to get gear/product suppliers to reduce prices? Get RDs to reduce their margins to lower entry fees? Somehow convince local government entities to provide free services to reduce event costs? Directly produce races that offer reduced costs, gear limitations, and limited services for the races? Provide direct subsidies to new triathlon participants (which would, net/net, simply be using money from existing members to subsidize new members)?
Perhaps it’s just a failure of my imagination, but I’ll be interested to see if they are able to make even a minor dent on many of these items. Hope I’m wrong…
Just a comment that doesn’t necessarily disagree with what you’re saying, but there should be some actionable, measurable outcomes behind what they are planning to do.
" To craft a strategic plan for your organization, you first need to determine the goals you’re trying to reach. Strategic goals are an organization’s measurable objectives that are indicative of its long-term vision."
I know in the past for example, when draft legal was sorta becoming a thing, several of the prominent DL events were getting some seed funding to put on said events. 1 easy step and it’s staring USAT right in the face. Each state’s “state championship” event could be the 1st step in helping with cost. I do believe to host a state championship said events had to “bid” on it (or atleast that was the process in the past), so that could actually be an low cost give back.
I actually don’t think your going to get athletes to race more often. I think that ship has sailed that we overall as a sport are too 70.3/IM “focused” and that 1 big event sorta outweighs any additional other racing opportunities. And I will put my hand up as a coach in the sport, I’m part of the problem that gets an AG’er who wants to race a 70.3 and then says I’ll do 1-2 events in the lead up and that’s it. But I think we are too far gone beyond grass roots racing mattering anymore to have any real impact beyond just the local race getting people into the sport, and then they basically jumping to their bigger goals relatively quickly from there.
I still have an issue with the data collection with triathlon. Because we are only a triathlete if we race, if you take a year off or even 10 years off in between races or membership periods, suddenly your “gone”. And guess what, maybe they are gone in the sene that they are no longer a data point, but they may still be working out to the best of their ability. They may be a runner only for a while, may be working on the swim, or maybe have given up on all exercise. But I just wish there was a way to categorize the “lifestyle” people who may or may not keep their membership, may or may not actually race. I think there is a percentage of people who just generally want to exercise in their life but if they don’t race or don’t keep their membership, suddenly they “don’t count” anymore.
They laid off a bunch of people. Some people who saw the writing on the wall also left. (I went to Law School with one)
Strategic plans should always have KPIs (uh goals).
You really think state championship events using a bidding process now. I have heard lots on the horse trading that happens. Just follow the money.
Bottom line, they mean nothing!!!
Bidding/hosting process for 2025 state championship events.
So again that’s an “easy” thing to push and/or help promote/discount if your trying to “grow” your sport. Don’t always have to re-invent the wheel.
Dave I realize you want to hate on all things usat seemingly, but your lack of ability to have any meaningful and objective conversations on these subjects shows with every post you make. So by all means, cheers.
Trust me, I know how the process really works. Not all of them, but will leave it at that. As I say time and time again, our sport is very small, and EVERYONE talks to each other.
It’s very small Dave. Which is why it seems like you don’t really bring anything productive to the conversation. Like if all you want to do is hate and bang on usat, by all means, be that guy. But don’t @ me when I’m bringing up basic concepts on how things can be improved.
USAT has a process where they pick races to “grow” the sport = state championships. There could be some pretty easy steps to take advantage of that relationship and race to “grow”. I know in the past usat has seed funded events (not talking full funding) to grow things. I’m sure there could be ways to take advantage of the state championship selected events to be an easy target at growing numbers.