Digging Into IRONMAN’s Data on Participation and Barriers to Entry

Yesterday IRONMAN released key data and research findings across the landscape of the sport, showing positive trend lines in participation but also some of the first concrete data we’ve had on barriers of entry to triathlon. It’s a report that provides reassurances that we could be in for the next growth phase in our sport, but it also highlights the potential high-water marks that we may hit without changes in how we, collectively, as stakeholders approach the sport.
The Positives: We’re Getting Younger, and There’s More of Us
More than 200,000 athletes registered for an IRONMAN or IRONMAN 70.3 race in 2024, which breaks out to a rough average of north than 1,200 athletes per race across the global portfolio of events. More importantly, though, is that the largest age group is 30-34. That’s the first time we’ve ever had this many athletes in that age band participating, and that figure is up 8% over 2023.

There’s also been a 39% increase since 2019 in first-time athletes under 30 entering IRONMAN-branded events. That shift is driven most dramatically at IRONMAN 70.3 events, with a 66% growth rate in that demographic over the same time span.
The top five countries with athletes participating are as follows:
- United States
- United Kingdom
- France (+16% in entries, most of any country)
- Germany
- Australia
Factor it all together, and you’re seeing a return towards races selling out earlier — 32 races globally have already reached capacity for the year.
Concerns: Women’s Participation and Cited Barriers to Entry
Triathlon remains primarily a man’s world. Globally, women make up only 18% of total IRONMAN entries. That number improves to 26% for IRONMAN 70.3s. This comes despite growth in 140.6 participation amongst women in the United States and Canada over the last year, with 10% more women taking on a long-course event. It mirrors a trend that we saw out of USA Triathlon’s data, where women are coming back to triathlon at a slower rate than men following the COVID-19 pandemic; women’s participation has only rebounded to 71% of pre-COVID levels, whereas men have hit 91% of their pre-COVID watermark.

IRONMAN then surveyed over 10,000 athletes from three different pools to try to get a better understanding of women’s barriers to entry to triathlon. Those pools were:
- Existing IRONMAN/IRONMAN 70.3 athletes;
- Female endurance athletes who have taken part in IRONMAN Group owned events outside of triathlon (e.g., UTMB, Epic Races, Rock n Roll Marathons)
- Female endurance athletes who have not taken part in IRONMAN Group events.
Unsurprisingly, “finding time” was the top reason listed as a barrier to participating in triathlon. When presented with options to further define the barriers to that time, women most frequently selected: family life demands; the volume of training required; lack of childcare to support training; and “finding time to train.” A full 56% of female athletes specifically cited the demand on family life as a barrier.
Cost was also a frequent barrier cited. Interestingly, more existing triathletes said that cost was a barrier than ones who have not yet entered the sport. 28% of current IRONMAN/IRONMAN 70.3 athletes stated cost was a concern. That’s more than double the percentage of non-current customers, at 13%. Non-triathletes also mentioned body image concerns as inhibitors to racing, with 23% of respondents mentioning them.
What Do We Do About It?
IRONMAN has cited some specific action steps based on responses in the survey. First, there’s talk of modifications to race experiences and offerings that may evolve in order to address these barriers to entry. Those may include things like courses, race distances, race locations, and/or onsite experiences in order to better appeal to athletes. There’s also talk of revamping existing programs and initiatives, including but not limited to Women For Tri, increasing media exposure of female athletes, and community-building events focused on overcoming real or perceived barriers to entry.
In a statement, Chief Executive Officer of The IRONMAN Group Scott DeRue said: “Our vision is simple; we want to give more people from around the world the opportunity to experience the life-changing journey of triathlon, and to inspire more people to reach for their IRONMAN dream. As the global leader of triathlon, we have both a responsibility and an opportunity to not only grow IRONMAN, but also to partner across the community to grow the sport. We only achieve this by continuing to listen to and care for our athletes with intent and purpose. With this goal in mind, we have an unwavering commitment to reducing key barriers to entry, evolving our product offerings, partnering with others who share our goals, and committing a sustained effort into community building, emerging markets, and developing the next generation of athletes.”
And here’s where we, collectively, as stakeholders come in. Because it’s not just about what IRONMAN does on this one. It’s about how we as media members act; it’s how brands that work within our space act; it’s how we as community members on our forum can interact with one another. We’re all responsible in some way, shape, or form of the health of the sport.
Let’s use one of the barrier examples that we talked about before: body image concerns. There’s a few ways that all of us, collectively, can do a better job on this front. We as media members can be better about diversity in body type and size in both who we hire to write / produce content, as well as be representative within our stories that we cover. Brands, meanwhile, can approach this with opportunity for product line diversification (not every single piece of triathlon apparel needs to be completely form-fitting, I promise) as well as having appropriate size spread on offer. And we, as community members, can continue to be mindful that body size, type, etc. are not proxies for how many races someone has done, or how well they have achieved at them.
Because, at the end of the day, 200,000 triathletes entering IRONMAN branded events isn’t enough. The top 100 running races in the USA last year had 1.8 million combined entrants. That’s the nut we eventually need to crack. And it starts with how we talk, engage, and promote our sport — all of us.
Tags:
IRONMANOpinionContinue the discussion at forum.slowtwitch.com
76 more replies
Sounds like solution is to bring back 5150 events
I think we’re missing a key piece of data on this one - how people get into the sport and whether 5i50 supplants or bolsters the local sprint/olympic tri scene.
5i50 may be good for IM (or not I suppose, or they’d continue with it), but if its just siphoning off participation from the local/independent races, it actually hurts the sport.
Shorter races would certainly help women who can’t manage the time aspect of long course training to have events they can prepare for.
Does having 2 different local race organizers hurt the sport? If not, how would IM having a shorter race format available be any different?
This kind of stuff is always interesting.
On one hand, it’s vital to get out and talk to the customers (and prospective customers). On the other hand, there’s often never someone so wrong about what the customer actually needs than the average customer.
So asking them why don’t they do this isn’t all that informative. Of course, they will say they don’t have time. That’s pretty much what everyone says about working out. I pay for a gym membership for my team at work and let them leave work 30 minutes early twice a week and the ones who are most out of shape say they are too tired and don’t have time to go (meanwhile others who are also overweight in terms of the bmi stats, make it a priority to go). This isn’t a shot at them or that answer, but we all have friends who don’t have time and are too tired, etc. As if the rest of us have tons of time and love to spring out of bed in the morning.
So it’s worth listening to what they say, but formulating an expensive strategy around it (like say women for tri to get them to Kona) at the expense of other choices is likely a big mistake.
Listen to what they say, but that is not the final say.
Regarding body image, whenever I bring new people to a race, they ALWAYS make the same remarks as they see a big person plugging away – wow, I never felt like I could do this before, but I totally can! There might be some legs to Ironman showing a bunch of larger people in their marketing materials, but that could also be just as wrong in the kind of message that gets internalized. Probably better to simply come out and say it – triathlon is for anyone that is willing to put in the work and wants to become a little better today than they were yesterday. Anyone can do it, anything is possible, cut to a variety of people crushing it on the course.
The real reason for my comment though is the things people say are the things they tell themselves (important), but not necessarily the things that matter. As was pointed out, most of them aren’t thinking about the cost, but once they know the costs they start thinking about it a lot more. They don’t know what they don’t know.
I still suggest the biggest driver of acquiring, and retaining customers is the tri clubs. Would anyone suggest that people on the tri clubs have unlimited time to train? No, but they make it a priority because of that sense of community. If Ironman wants to grow the customer base, they don’t need a magic wand to dole out more time or make people think they have more time, or teach them out to budget their time – but they need to activate and build more local communities.
Their race directors should be deeply plugged into that scene. It should be a main priority for them.
So point is – “why don’t you do triathlon” is not going to suddenly yield the answer, “because I don’t have a community of friends encouraging me and helping me do triathlon”. But likely that’s the answer we need.
It would be fantastic if they explored turning race weekends into a multisport festival at select races. My wife trains with me and travels to most of my races, but she doesn’t swim. That is the barrier to entry for her as it’s too time consuming and difficult for her to find the time to learn to swim then train while working full time along with having 2 young kids.
On Saturday races it would be fun to have a 5150 on Sunday and even offer a duathlon option. Or the option to do a duathlon in conjunction with the Saturday race. I think she would be a fantastic triathlete (once she learns to swim) and just getting her into races more would be that hump to motivate her once we have time for her to learn.
Because Ironman have a long history of either buying local races and then shutting them down when they don’t get the numbers they want OR setting up a new event close to the existing local race and scheduling their race so close to the local race that punters need to choose between one or the other. The M-Dot brand draws them in and the local race ends up shutting down. Shortly after that Ironman shuts down their short race due to lower than expected numbers and the area now has no race at all.
Ironman training is a part-time job, very few people are ever going to be in a position to manage that time commitment. Women still deal with most of the family-raising. So we’re down to singles and childless couples and the wealthy with nannies, as the potential pool of woman entrants. There’s not much can be done from the supply side to change that…
in the sprints and olympic distances, my sense is that it’s much more balanced. Ironman should commit to supporting local shorter races…
Frankly, that’s why I think 70.3 is going to be far more successful for them over the long haul. You can successfully complete 70.3, and in some cases do pretty well, on 8 or so hours a week of training. That’s approaching “I’m kinda serious about running” levels of training.
It’s part of overcoming the stigma of simultaneously being “the toughest single day endurance race on the planet” while also being achievable by…well…anybody. It’s not about “the work.” It’s about showing that, well, if you’re just trying to complete the damn thing…it’s not that much to bite off.
.
If it isn’t already obvious ,I spend a lot of time on YouTube following various sporting interests and the algorithm sends all kinds of cool channels my way.As a result I have seen so many newbie Triathletes documenting their first Tri experience and almost all of them are 70.3’s and a hell of a lot of them are women.
This is one of last weeks additions and it is fairly typical of what I am seeing in the YouTube space. She is pretty funny. (I am Vagabond_Road in the comments)
I’d also say the observation that they have strong growth in the younger market is one area they should be acting on. Ironman doesn’t allow under 18s. Totally makes sense.
I would do several more 70.3 races a year if Ironman allowed under 18s with a chaperone.
And with that in mind, back to my sense of community – buddy division would be a pretty cool age group. You and a buddy sign up to race side by side and have to cross timing mats/finish line with a few seconds of each other. They get their own awards category. That right there has a decent potential for increasing participation.
None of these solutions come from the observation, “not enough time”.
Yeah this was never a barrier of entry for women, they just aren’t as interested in “going to Kona”.
I would say the main reason why I am questioning my sanity in wanting to continue to do 6 half Ironmans and 1 Ironman/year is the cost. It cost me over $900 Canadian to enter Oceanside (includes USAT membership. CEO is paying herself $350k/year). St George is another $875. These races used to be $250. I wouldn’t even think about it. Once you add up flight, car rental, accommodations, etc. Now, if I enter 7 races it costs $7k just to enter. I would say that is why long term fans of the brand are reconsidering. People who are new to the sport have nothing to compare to, and more than likely will be a one and done.
Funny you mention that. It looks like the New Mexico 70.3 that was just announced will have something similar. The dates for the race are both July 11th and 12th. They are advertising a 70.3, 5150 and sprint. Ruidoso New Mexico Festival Weekend | IRONMAN
I like that they set the swim on the sprint at 500m. I think it’s a great way to get people to stay an extra day and to increase participation by offering the chance for companions to compete at a more reasonable opening event distance.